Tuesday, October 30, 2012

A vote in the trash is a vote for you!


The other day my loving, and very well-meaning friend, Andrew Orvedahl, chose to write a blog about why he votes and why he believes all conscientious non-voters should do so as well.  When posting the well-written piece to his Facebook profile, he chose to tag me on it, exposing to all 3400 of my followers that I in fact have decided to abstain from participating in this year's election.  A decision that I admittedly wasn't too thrilled about. 

Not because Andrew wasn't respectful of me or my intellect, but because I have a huge fear of being viewed as someone who is irrational and quixotic; or just plain ignorant for that matter.  And to some, I am.  I did very poorly in school.  My sentence structure and grammar leaves a lot to be desired.  I'm much better at conveying my thoughts through spoken word and I've chosen stand-up comedy and music as a path for that reason.  But I do want to respond to Andrew's blog and offer up my reasoning for those that were wondering. 

By the way, if you haven't read it please do so here: http://www.fiveunicorns.com/2012/10/25/a-note-to-my-progressive-non-voting-pals-in-colorado/

Some of you won't agree with this, and I totally accept and respect that.  I'm in no way telling any of you not to vote.  I respect your opinions and individuality.  But I wanted to stand my ground and speak my peace, even at the risk of being viewed as idealistic or childish.  I wanted to write this because I will not be an anonymous comment.  I'll defend my views.

First off, let me say this, some of the points Andrew made about Obama and his record in office are meant to address points that I had tried to make in a heated debate.  And, as I often do when debating, I get more wrapped up in winning than being honest.  

Let me be clear on this; four years ago I did vote for this man.  I, like a lot of people, was moved by his conviction and overwhelming message of hope and change.  If you know me, you'd know this is all I work towards in both my personal and professional life.  An evolution of myself, however slow that may be.  But over the past four years, I didn't see those ideals carried out.  I saw more of the same carried out in the normal lazy-susan style of politics we've grown accustomed to.  Every candidate is starting to look more and more alike.  I don't believe this is due to some phantom government machine that feeds off the goodwill of the populace in an effort to maintain control.  And this is in no way an indictment of the president as a person.  I believe that he wanted what he said.  He wanted to be a leader.  He wanted to exact some change.  How can you look around and not?  So, no, this is not a criticism or questioning of his integrity?  This is an indictment of the current state of politics and us, the people.  When I look back at Obama's time, I see a person that played the political game as the others have, all in an attempt to get re-elected.  The fact is, I don't find anyone on the ballot capable of making the initial decisions and steps to lead us to the place we need to be.  And to be fair, I'm not that person either.  Quite honestly, I don't think he exists.  Scientifically and historically, we're not meant to be lead.  Our most successful societies and civilizations were those that relied on each other.  So I ask you, why bother?

I understand Andrew's point about the civil rights issue.  But I guess I just feel like those are things that will change inevitably.  I don't think the gay, lesbian, and transgender community will see equality because of the actions of one man.  That to me is insulting and degrading to all those brave people who stood in the streets every year and marched, for years, weathering the mocking and jeering of the lessening majority.  Civil rights have always come at the hand of a strong and organized minority, willing to stand steadfast and fight until the slower majority comes around.  Mitt may pass a law, but there are hundreds and thousands of individuals like Andrew and myself who will stand beside our friends and family members in the streets and ensure that everyone around us learns that each individual you're trying to hold down has a story.  One that is imperfect and real and relatable.  I believe that on a long enough timeline, enough will let their guard down.  We put our fists up at first because we're afraid, but the more and more we see something, and see what we thought we were afraid of in those closest to us, the more we start to relax and understand that we need only concern ourselves with issues of real and imminent personal safety.  Equality starts with a small group who refuse to be silenced, and then the larger group that follows suit, and those who'll finally stop listening to their fears of being stigmatized and start listening to the inner urge to protect those who we share stories with.  One guy won't fucking change that.  I believe more than ever in the positive potential of the human being.

I thought of this recently and I've posted it a thousand times.  I'll say it again: Do not mistake natural reactions to unnatural circumstances as being what is inherently in our nature.  

And politics have become the best example of this.  I will no longer take part in the divisive locomotive that is our current political system.  The more and more I watch, the more and more disillusioned I become by the fact that our system has become solely based on fear.  It's all numbers.   And numbers start with the best intentions for categorizing, but then eventually become a tool for dehumanizing each of us that makes up one point.  Case in point: I grew to hate the south because of politics.  I hated that other 50 or 51%.  They're all stupid and racist.  Until I started traveling more and met terrific and shitty people everywhere.  Including the south.  I met smart people.  Hard working people.  Not that different than myself.  People who sat through my show.  Who laughed.  Who fed me.  And who sure as shit would not have done so if we'd talked about the fucking president.  

People aren't bad, we're just reacting poorly to unnatural circumstances.  

Our country is more polarized than ever, but yet we continue to create and purchase more and more devices and gadgets to connect us to each other and those around the world.  We're obviously craving something.  Something tangible.  Something primal and meaningful.  So we vote for the things we hope will improve our lives and fill the void.  Ignorant of the fact that the very thing we're doing to try and fix us, is making it worse.  We're like addicts.

So I don't vote.  I believe that sometimes the only way to stop something that's out of control is to take our hands off the wheel, understand we're helpless now, and let it crash.  Then we sort out the damage, let it sting, learn, and recreate.  

But others will continue.  And the government doesn't need your vote, Ben.
  
I think it's a common myth that they don't care if you abstain from voting.  The way I see it, those employed in government need your votes.  On two levels: 1.  Participation. This system doesn't work without it maintaining a certain level.  I think some people toil under the delusion that American politics would continue if only six people were in line.  It needs your votes, and a lot of them, because the government is us, and if most of US aren't voting, well then, that's a symptom of a greater problem needing attention.  It's the reason there are more and more articles about why the voting pool is shrinking and why the youth are so disillusioned.  2. Profitability.  The federal government spent over $100 million dollars this year on non-partisan voter initiatives.  Not to mention the combined billions that are being spent by either candidate, outside organizations, and super pacs.  Why would they spend that much on voting if they didn't need it?  That kind of money doesn't float around if money is not being returned ten fold to it's investors.  People are making more and more money off television, book deals, and the general business of politics because your vote is money.  Because in essence, it is an approval of that person you selected, the concessions they will make, and the favors they will return.

Make no mistake, this is a business, and a gigantic one at that; and it's product is votes.  And I will not continue contributing to it.  For the same reason that if I'm thirsty I will not continue to give money to a lemonade stand where the vendor just spits in my hand to save a buck.  I'll just turn around ask you all for help in digging up some water.  

You're right.  I may not have a right to complain if I don't participate.  But, I also don't want to hear you complain if your "lesser-than-two-evils" vote allows it to continue. 









16 comments:

  1. While I understand abstaining from voting for president, there are measures on the the ballot that you should vote for (or against) because they, more than a 4 year presidential term, have a larger bearing on the future.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thank you for this. Perhaps I should have clarified better. This concerns just the presidential election.


    signed,

    therealworldiswhatwemakeit



    ReplyDelete
  3. I don't think most people vote because they think the political system is particularly inspiring. There are a number of things that the president will have the power to change in the next four years that impact a great many in this country in a very real way - abortion and women's health to name two. I can understand how young white males can abstain from voting and feel some righteousness about it. But you may choose to care about how the choice of president/party will affect many, many other people in this country (women, immigrants, the poor, the elderly, etc) and vote because you empathize and want for the best circumstances for all of them, no?

    And I couldn't agree more that the real world is what we make it, so why not spend time being involved improving the world instead of abstaining from it? Politics should change, but we have to be the ones to change it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Once again, and someone else brought this point up in the Facebook posts, this is not a cry for apathetic inaction. And if you know me personally, you know I'm not someone who sits around waiting for things to change. I'm a person that believes that all I can do is act according to my beliefs and convictions. I most certainly support women's rights as well as the gay/lesbian/transgender communities struggle for equality. I, however, don't believe that those decisions are made by the president. And to give him credit and that much control to me is a farce. Any federal, absolute legislation, for or against either side of both these topics will be met by a roadblock from the opposition. This will inevitably and always end up in the courts. And I hope that the courts do the right thing.

      Delete
  4. I don't disagree with much of your diagnosis, but I'm not so sure of the cure. While it's true that civil rights are partly won in the streets, they're also won in the courts. And they can be really slowed down by another conservative Supreme Court justice or two. (not to mention even more right wing federal judges.) Meanwhile, people are deprived of their rights (and sometimes worse) until they're lucky enough for all the puzzle pieces to fall together.

    Also, I think you're wrong about "them" needing our vote. If they wanted everybody to vote they wouldn't go to such great lengths to disenfranchise people. No, the fewer people vote, the fewer they have to target. The money spent is small potatoes once you figure the legislation they buy.

    Anyway, I'm not right - just my two cents. Everybody's gotta do what they think is best. LOVE you!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. First off, Nora. Thanks for using your name. I may be wrong, but I'll stand and take my lashings. Anonymous commenting pisses me off to no end. Especially when yours is of the seemingly welcomed view.

      I believe, as we just saw with Justice Robertson, that some, if not a large percentage of Supreme Court judges, are concerned with their legacy. I hope and believe when it reaches that point, that they'll do the right thing, if only because they don't want to be the bigot that stood in the way of progress.

      And I disagree with your disagreement, Nora. I believe certain municipalities in the past have gone to lengths to ensure certain groups of minorities don't vote in coveted districts. Mostly black. But the latino vote?! And me?! the 18 to 35 year old white male? OOOOOH, yes they need me. We're worth a lot to both campaigns. NPR figured that one Colorado vote was worth approximately $1000.00. Once again, why else would we spend billions of dollars in ad campaigns and voter initiatives? This has become a business connected to thousands of different ventures, and I feel it shouldn't be. And if I feel a game is unfairly rigged, I'm not going to continue to contribute. I'll continue to live my life as I see fit. To me, that's all one can do.

      I love you, Nora. And I hope you're wearing a pretty sweet fucking hat right now.

      Delete
    2. I agree. Wholeheartedly.

      The problem here though is that I agree with both yourself and Andrew as I'm ridiculously torn about this very issue. I too voted in the last presidential election for Obama as a previously registered Democrat. Having hated the party line since being allowed to vote I feel dirty every time I'm in the booth. However siding more with the one than the other I opted for the "lesser of two" etc. and it hasn't sat right with me ever.

      I've since re-registered as a Libertarian. Mostly in an effort to piss off my family of flag waving dems, but also in the very loosely held party opinion that government needs to be down-scaled. Simplify and re-organize sounds blissfully nostalgic and revolutionary to me.

      I support the following statement, taken from the lp.org website, more than any other that I've heard coming out of another party:

      "Each individual has the right to control his or her own body, action, speech, and property. Government's only role is to help individuals defend themselves from force and fraud."

      I offer no solution of my own as I'm still unsure as to a vote's affect on anything, if anything.

      I find the argument that a vote being worth a thousand dollars if broken down to the individual level absurd in it's miniscule nature though. This is the same set of clowns that has little to no concern over billions and trillions spent or collected. $1000.00 given to each person on the planet or collected from them would still only be 6-7 trillion dollars comprising just over 30% of our overall current national debt. Doing the same for just the bodies in the dUS coming in at a measly 3.15ish billion. We've spent more on CDOT's budget in the past 4 years and I still get a chip in my windshield every fucking time I hit I-70.

      My point being that the big business monetary issue to me is moot. It's a pittance. Throw away change for the country with no shortage of ink and paper to just print more.

      Alas I also disagree with the idea that the courts will sort it out. If the executive branch isn't worth contributing too due to ineptitude and by nature helps establish the judicial and legislative etc etc how can we ignore the process of one and expect the others to appropriately check and balance?

      I'll end on those notes for now as I could randomly diatribe and contradict myself all day. I have no idea what to do, but I know that if you asked me to I'd help you find some water, just as much as I'd throw prarie dogs at a McDonalds from within a rainbow flagged tree stand with Andrew.

      Delete
    3. I respect your opinion, Adam, but as I've said, I think you're giving far too much power to the president. I believe that when given the task to decide on issues of civil rights, I believe the Supreme Court will do the right thing. If not, I'll stand by those that I support and continue voicing my opinions on stage as a show of solidarity.

      And I wish we would stop glossing over the money issues. The staggering numbers of companies and wealthy individuals that contribute to campaigns and super pacs is proof positive that your vote is worth something. It has a value because it means greater returns for their private enterprises when concessions are made in return by the elected official. These companies don't contribute billions of dollars out of the goodness of their hearts. When you're at work, that's not what you do. If you're at work, you're working to further that business. Your vote is money and power to the people who benefit and profit by their guy getting in.

      Delete
    4. Upholding the ACA isn't all it's cracked up to be, being as how it paves the way to fucking with the commerce clause, so stay tune on that. And you had 4 justices weighing in against it. Roberts is very likely to side with a turnover of Roe v. Wade, btw. The wild card is Kennedy. But, one more Scalia on the court would doom it for sure (And would NOT be good for gay rights.) So, I think your confidence in the courts is misplaced. Also, federal judges are appointed by the president and the GOP has held them up under Obama so he's appointed many fewer judges than 8 years of Bush. If Romney is elected, they'll fill that backlog lickety-split (Yea! I said "lickety-split"!) and the courts will lurch even further to the right and stay there for decades.

      As far as the money spent… Do know that studies have shown that excessive negative campaign ads (such as we see more and more and more, especially from the Super PACs) have proved to SUPPRESS the vote? So, the amount of money spent isn't necessarily indicative of the fact they need your vote. IF you vote, they want your vote. But, if you DON'T vote, that's easily one less vote for the Other Guy.

      xo/n

      Delete
    5. Precisely my point. Any legislation can be turned over. All that happens is one candidate comes into office, tries to fix a problem that is immune because they can't possibly correct an ideological malady, so swing voters become disillusioned and begin voting for the opposite side. The other side takes office and begins doing everything they can to dismantle any progress they had made. This has become less about doing what's good for the rest of the nation and more about beating the other side. I'm tired of it. Period. I don't believe he has a much control. I believe he's a figurehead and I won't participate. Olympia Snowe stepped down for the same reasons. She won't participate in the partisanship. She's working on her own causes now. I respect that.

      This is big business. Politics are no longer people's service, it's their path to wealth and excess. And people will do anything to stay in power to continue keep the favors and incentives flowing in. And it needs you the voters to buy into the value of the plan and the mechanism to work. That's the way I feel. I know we disagree. But I know we both agree that life is about the filters you see it through. At this point in my life, this is how I see it.

      Delete
    6. On that, we absolutely agree. In the end, we're all just victims/beneficiaries of the time and space we happen to occupy. Rome fell. Romans didn't go away. They just started calling themselves Italians. (Of course, there WERE those pesky Dark Ages to go through…)

      Delete
    7. Funny you mention Rome. Let's not forget the myriad of factors that led to their collapse. Christian leaders taking more prominent rolls in politics. The Barbarian outsiders that looted their tax revenue. Corruption in their highest levels of government. Inflation. Lead in their drinking water. Hoarding of public resources by a small wealthy elite. An inflated trade deficit. And a military that was becoming increasingly ill-prepared. And the one constant throughout the years; a fattened populace that became far too afraid and complacent to stop it. Some of these things sound familiar to me. I just wonder if people notice that anytime an initiative to correct our political system through inaction or supporting a third party comes up, that they immediately sight the importance of that election. Every election seems dire during times of unrest. At some point we have to rally and be the guardians of each other and the architects of change at the same time.

      I love you and Phil, Nora. Good chat.

      Delete
    8. Oh, this empire is teetering, no doubt. I'd just selfishly prefer that it actually collapse after I'm gone. OR, that we can get a relatively soft landing like the British. (If one can describe London during the Blitz a soft landing.)

      And I love you too, Ben.

      Delete
  5. Oh! And for the record, they are certainly going out of their way to mislead Latino voters for this election cycle.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Misleading and suppressing are two totally different things.

      Delete
    2. I mean about when, where and how to vote - didn't make that clear.

      Delete